David Souter – Coordinating Scientist
Dr Souter is the Australian Antarctic Division’s Acting Chief Scientist and was at Bunger Hills for eight weeks as coordinating scientist.
How would you describe what you’ve just experienced? It went very, very well. We delivered so much science, and one of the hallmarks was just how everyone involved, irrespective of whether they were part of the camp set-up crew, a scientist, a field training officer, a doctor, communications operator, chef, electrician, a helicopter engineer or a ground support officer, really delivered in such a collaborative, committed way. It was just fantastic.
What do you attribute that to? One element was the excitement of delivering a deep field campaign. It’s something we haven’t done for a long time. But it was also because of the people involved. We’d say “this is likely what the weather might allow us to do tomorrow, but if it changes, prepare to do this instead”, and people were totally on board with that because they could see that every effort was being made to ensure that everyone got the resources they needed. If they didn’t get to their site today, they’d be prioritised tomorrow.
Twelve projects, 27 scientists, four different funding sources – it sounds extraordinarily complicated. There were lots of moving parts. In reality everyone chipped in to deliver everyone else’s project. Early on we had the RAID [Rapid Access Ice Drill] drilling campaign, which probably took a week or two longer than anticipated so we had to swap a few people out of the drilling crew and a few others, from other projects, stepped in happily, knowing the help they gave would be repaid later and that’s exactly what happened.
Weather was always going to be a major factor. How did that play out? December was fantastic. We only lost one day to bad weather but the last three weeks were very challenging. We had bad weather then we had a medical transfer from Davis to Casey (which meant the helicopters were redeployed for several days). About ten days before the end of the field season, the list of things we still wanted to deliver was very long and we were having serious conversations with the science group about which things were the ‘must dos’ and which were the ‘nice to haves’. We deliberately kept everything on the table because we knew if we had a good couple of days, we could still deliver almost the entire science program.
Sampling at Mt Strathcona only happened in the final days and it pushed up pretty close to pack up. Was there a thought that it might not happen? Mt Strathcona, because it’s more remote up on the ice plateau, it blows 40 knots, it’s −20° Celsius, it was always going to be a challenge to get there and you need really good days. Fortunately we got there in the end. There were a few things we didn’t manage to deliver which was a shame, but I think as a campaign we delivered far more than anyone ever envisaged.
There are literally tonnes of rock and ice samples heading back to Australia for analysis. How important is this science going to be? I think this campaign will ultimately be a landmark campaign for the Antarctic program. The geologists alone collected one tonne of rock and they’ll now be analysed for years to come. That’s an intergenerational contribution to science. The hot water drilling team have probably found things that are genuinely new in terms of how water is circulating underneath the Shackleton Ice Shelf and that will contribute a much greater understanding of how stable our ice shelves are. So the breadth of work that’s been done will be scientifically very important as analysis is conducted and papers are published.